STATE v. HOWELL


240 Or. 558 (1965)

402 P.2d 89

STATE OF OREGON v. HOWELL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed May 19, 1965.

Petition for rehearing denied June 15, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward N. Fadeley, Eugene, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellant.

F.W. Linklater, Deputy District Attorney, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was William F. Frye, District Attorney, Eugene.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and SLOAN, GOODWIN and HOLMAN, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

SLOAN, J.

Defendant appeals from an enhanced penalty imposed upon him as a result of habitual criminal proceedings. He claims he was wronged because the act is discriminately enforced.

The assignments of error are directed at the refusal of the trial court to hear evidence relating to the alleged discrimination. The evidence was properly refused. The same question, in different form, has been before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases