Defendant was acquitted on its first count which charged a violation of subdivision 1 of section 483 in respect to one Higgins and also on counts third and fourth which charged violations of subdivision 2 in respect to two other minors. The theory of the prosecution was that defendant was instrumental in arranging a beer-drinking party in his home at which Connor and the three other teen-agers became intoxicated and in that state were permitted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
