1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 342 F.2d
  5. 342 F.2d 447 (1965)
 

TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT v. UNITED STATES

No. 445-60.

342 F.2d 447 (1965)

TULELAKE IRRIGATION DISTRICT v. The UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

March 12, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alvin Landis, Sacramento, Cal., for plaintiff.

Herbert Pittle, Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. Ramsey Clark, for defendant.

Before COWEN, Chief Judge, and LARAMORE, DAVIS and COLLINS, Judges.

DAVIS, Judge.1

The major question is the interpretation of an ambiguous contract provision allocating costs for the removal of excess water from the Lower Klamath Lake Wildlife Refuge (or Area). The clause first appeared in an agreement entered into, in 1946, between the Bureau of Reclamation and the Fish and Wildlife Service of the Department of the Interior; it was incorporated by reference in a contract dated September 10, 1956, between...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases