Defendant claimed, in substance, that at the time he pleaded guilty he was in such a mental condition as to be unable to understand the charges against him or to confer with counsel in making a defense to those charges, of which he was innocent. In denying defendant's application, the trial court found that defendant had failed to sustain his burden of proof by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence. Order affirmed. (Cf. People v. Chait,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
