1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 242 F.Supp.
  5. 242 F.Supp. 538 (1965)
 

HEYER v. BRENNER

Civ. A. No. 383-64.

242 F.Supp. 538 (1965)

Robert H. HEYER, Plaintiff, v. Edward J. BRENNER, Commissioner of Patents, Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

June 21, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George Arkwright, Jr., Shlesinger, Shlesinger & Arkwright, Washington, D. C., Gibson Yungblut, Yungblut, Melville, Strasser & Foster, Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Clarence W. Moore, Sol., U. S. Patent Office, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

JACKSON, District Judge.

This action came on for trial February 1, 1965. Upon consideration of the evidence, together with briefs the parties were accorded an opportunity to file, the Court has found for the defendant, and against the plaintiff, and will cause the Complaint to be dismissed.

In accordance with Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court states its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law separately as follows:

FINDINGS OF...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases