1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 342 F.2d
  5. 342 F.2d 431 (1965)
 

MOHASCO INDUSTRIES, INC. v. E. T. BARWICK MILLS, INC.

No. 20966.

342 F.2d 431 (1965)

MOHASCO INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant, v. E. T. BARWICK MILLS, INC. and Barwick Carpet Mills, Inc., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

March 18, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert E. Mayer, Atlanta, Ga., Stanton T. Lawrence, Jr., Leslie B. Young, New York City, Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor & Adams, New York City, of counsel, for appellant.

Charles H. Walker, New York City, M. Cook Barwick, Wilson, Branch, Barwick and Vandiver, Atlanta, Ga., Albert E. Fey, Fish, Richardson & Neave, New York City, of counsel, for appellees.

Before WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

In petition for rehearing appellant takes us to task for use of the words in our opinion that we are in agreement "with the result reached by the trial court," and concludes that we have held by implication that some of the findings of the trial court were clearly erroneous and that we may have disapproved of rules of law applied by the trial court. Such interpretation is incorrect. We consider the opinion of the District Court sufficiently informative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases