1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 240 Or.
  5. 240 Or. 533 (1965)
 

RICHARDSON-MERRELL, INC. v. MAIN

240 Or. 533 (1965)

402 P.2d 746

RICHARDSON-MERRELL, INC. v. MAIN

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Disallowed June 3, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin J. Peterson, Portland, argued the cause for plaintiff. With him on the brief were G.W. Kellington, Medford, and Tooze, Powers, Kerr, Tooze & Peterson, Portland.

William V. Deatherage, Medford, argued the cause for defendant. On the brief were Frohnmayer, Lowry & Deatherage, Medford.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, DENECKE, HOLMAN and LUSK, Justices.

PEREMPTORY WRIT DISSALLOWED.

LUSK, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus.

The plaintiff, Richardson-Merrell, Inc., is the defendant in an action pending in the Circuit Court for Jackson County, brought by Mary Lucas to recover damages for personal injury alleged to have been caused by the use of a prescriptive drug manufactured by the plaintiff corporation. The defendant is The Honorable James Main, one of the judges of such court.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases