Order, entered on December 18, 1964, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.
Only the plaintiff has appealed but, in affirming, it should be noted that we do not approve of the condition imposed by Special Term that the denial should be "without prejudice to any plenary action plaintiff might be advised to institute." (See Handelman v. Peabody, 285 App. Div. 689; Gallin v. Stafford,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.