Per Curiam.
There was no evidence of undue influence and upon that issue a verdict was properly directed. There were substantial inconsistencies as between the testimony of the lawyers who acted as the subscribing witnesses and their pretrial evidence and other statements. There was supporting evidence but it was elicited from a beneficiary under the will. Under the circumstances we are constrained to hold that the credibility of the witnesses should have been...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
