We concur with the finding of the court below that despite sufficient legal evidence to support the indictment, the presence of "Certain hearsay evidence of a prejudicial nature" required a dismissal of the indictment and a resubmission to the Grand Jury and that in this case receipt of the hearsay evidence was prejudicial to the defendant.
Order affirmed, without costs.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
