Per Curiam.
The denial was "without prejudice to a renewal thereof during or at the conclusion of trial", which provision would seem to indicate misapprehension as to the function of a motion to dismiss for legal insufficiency; and although the State contends that this constituted a deferment and correctly argues that it was entitled to a decision with finality, we treat
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
