Renewed motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal from the said order of November 27, 1964, denied.
Respondent claims that this order is one which in effect denied reargument of the prior application for support, and that an order denying reargument is not appealable. In our opinion, under the circumstances here, this order must be deemed to be one which denied petitioner's application to modify the prior order, based on new or supervening facts which arose after...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
