MATTER OF HAMILTON v. TRANSP. WORKERS UNION OF GREATER NEW YORK


16 N.Y.2d 696 (1965)

In the Matter of John Hamilton, Respondent, v. Transport Workers Union of Greater New York, Local 100, et al., Appellants. Workmen's Compensation Board, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided June 10, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth K. Floyd and Philip J. Caputo for appellants.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Julius Fell, Paxton Blair and Daniel Polansky of counsel), for Workmen's Compensation Board, respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, BURKE and BERGAN. Dissent: Judges VAN VOORHIS and SCILEPPI.


Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen's Compensation Board.

Judges VAN VOORHIS and SCILEPPI dissent in the following memorandum: An employee cannot obtain workmen's compensation if he is injured in the course of doing a thing forbidden by his employer (Matter of Hyatt v. United States Rubber Reclaiming Co., 256 N.Y. 571, affg. 230 App. Div. 743; Matter of Boggan v. Abby Finishing Co.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases