1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 63 Cal.2d
  5. 63 Cal.2d 643 (1965)
 

CITY OF PLEASANTON v. BRYANT

Docket No. S.F. 22161.

63 Cal.2d 643 (1965)

408 P.2d 135

47 Cal. Rptr. 807

CITY OF PLEASANTON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. THURSTON O. BRYANT, Defendant and Appellant. T.O. BRYANT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON et al., Defendants and Respondents. (Consolidated Cases.)

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

December 7, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles B. Snow, Naranjan S. Heer and Snow & Heer for Defendant and Appellant and Plaintiffs and Appellants.

William A. Struthers, Jr., City Attorney, Sturgis, Den-Dulk, Douglass & Anderson and Robert T. Anderson for Plaintiff and Respondent and Defendants and Respondents.

BURKE, J.

These two mandamus proceedings, consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal, involve the validity of (1) an incorporation proceeding initiated by appellants (selftermed the Dublin Group); and (2) an annexation proceeding subsequently undertaken by the City of Pleasanton, of territory which overlapped that included in the incorporation proceeding.1 [1] We have concluded that the trial court correctly determined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases