In his petition, appellant alleged that he was sane and that his continued detention violated due process. The writ was allowed, and a hearing was had, at which a psychiatrist appointed by the court testified that appellant was mentally ill and required hospitalization. Contrary to appellant's assertion, this testimony was based on a personal examination as well as a review of his medical history. Upon conclusion of the hearing, the writ was...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
