MATTER OF McNULTY v. STATE LIQ. AUTH.


48 Misc.2d 653 (1965)

In the Matter of Theodore P. McNulty, Petitioner, v. State Liquor Authority et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

April 19, 1965


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bornstein & Bornstein (David Bornstein of counsel), for petitioner. Hyman Amsel and Lawrence Kunin for State Liquor Authority, respondent. Reavis & McGrath (Carl Kaplan of counsel), for Barmat Corp., respondent.


J. IRWIN SHAPIRO, J.

Petitioner brings this proceeding pursuant to the provisions of section 123 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law to restrain the respondent Barmat Corp. from selling or trafficking in liquor. The respondent State Liquor Authority has approved, but has not yet issued, an off-premises liquor license to Barmat.

By way of an order to show cause, petitioner seeks an order temporarily and permanently restraining Barmat, "pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases