1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 28 Wis.2d
  5. 28 Wis.2d 665 (1965)
 

HUGHES v. STATE

28 Wis.2d 665 (1965)

HUGHES, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 2, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by George G. Lorinczi and Lorinczi & Weiss, attorneys, and James M. Shellow and Shellow & Shellow of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by George G. Lorinczi.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Paul T. Miller, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Hugh R. O'Connell, district attorney.

HEFFERNAN, J.

The plaintiff in error takes the position that inasmuch as the misdemeanor convictions which occurred during the period of probation were set aside, that the subsequent revocation of probation is without foundation in fact. He, of course, assumes that the mere fact of conviction was the basis of Judge STEFFES' revocation.

A careful perusal of the record does not bear this out. The record shows that on March 2, 1964, upon the court's

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases