KENT v. UNITED STATES

No. 211, Docket 29050.

343 F.2d 349 (1965)

Sidney KENT, doing business as Dorald Engineering Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided March 30, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. Ben Greenman, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.

John R. Horan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Southern District of New York (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., Robert E. Kushner, Asst. U. S. Atty., Southern District of New York, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.

Before FRIENDLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges, and BLUMENFELD, District Judge.


BLUMENFELD, District Judge:

Sidney Kent, d/b/a Dorald Engineering Co., moved in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for summary judgment on his claim for extra expenses resulting from government-caused delays in his performance of a construction contract for the Government. The District Court held that the contract was not breached by the Government, denied the plaintiff's motion, and granted summary judgment for the defendant. We...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases