BARNES v. SIND

No. 9608.

347 F.2d 324 (1965)

Roland E. BARNES, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Abraham S. SIND and Israel Cohen, partners, trading as A. Sind & Associates and Abraham S. Sind and Israel Cohen, individually, Appellees and Cross-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

June 4, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene M. Feinblatt, Baltimore, Md., John Silard, Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., Washington, D. C., for appellant and cross-appellee.

Edward Pierson, Baltimore, Md., Morris D. Schwartz, Washington, D. C., for appellees and cross-appellants.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

We find nothing in the petition for rehearing en banc which did not receive the full consideration of the Court. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court.

In light of the dissenting opinion of Judge Sobeloff, in which Judge Bell joins, it may be appropriate to add a few brief comments.

It is very doubtful that the lady has any dower interest in this land held in the name of her husband...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases