Order, entered December 6, 1962, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-respondent.
We agree with Special Term that the provisions of former Civil Practice Act (see § 1518 [subd. 9-a]) did not authorize the taxation by the defendant of the fees paid and loss of interest incurred in connection with the deposit of funds with the City Treasurer to secure a stay of execution. We do not reach the question of whether either of such items...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
