1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 239 Or.
  5. 239 Or. 419 (1965)
 

SPRING v. SPRING

239 Or. 419 (1965)

398 P.2d 127

SPRING v. SPRING

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed January 13, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerald H. Robinson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Stephen M. King, Portland.

R.W. Kitson, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Rader & Kitson, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN and DENECKE, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PERRY, J.

The plaintiff and defendant are divorced. This proceeding was commenced by the plaintiff, wherein she asked that the child support order made in the original cause be increased.

The basis of the request seeking an increase is that the amount of support allowed for the four children is insufficient and that the defendant by reason of a promotion and transfer will have a larger income.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases