1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Mich.
  4. 375 Mich.
  5. 375 Mich. 281 (1965)
 

TITCHENAL v. JACKSON & CHURCH CO.

Calendar No. 36, Docket No. 50,530.

375 Mich. 281 (1965)

134 N.W.2d 224

TITCHENAL v. JACKSON & CHURCH CO.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided April 9, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McCauley & Anderson (Francis W. McCauley, of counsel), for plaintiff.

McGraw, Allen, Haass & Selander (J. David Owens, of counsel), for defendant.

PER CURIAM:

This case is similar to Reed v. Kurdziel, 352 Mich. 287. Like questions are brought up for review. They call (a) for judicial identification of the oral and sharply disputed undertakings of the parties, and (b) for judicial determination whether plaintiff was the "procuring cause" of certain sales that were made by defendant shortly after it discharged him. The findings below having been found unsatisfactory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases