1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 241 Or.
  5. 241 Or. 410 (1965)
 

STATE v. ROLPH

241 Or. 410 (1965)

406 P.2d 158

STATE OF OREGON v. ROLPH

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed September 29, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Oscar D. Howlett, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

Tom P. Price, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and SLOAN, DENECKE, HOLMAN and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of the charge of selling narcotics. A Portland police officer made the purchase from defendant. When defendant's counsel cross-examined the officer he was permitted to question the officer at length as to the officer's financial situation. It was an attempt to discredit the officer.

The state then called the policeman's superior officer who was permitted, over objection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases