The accidental injury described and found was the laceration of a nevus, also referred to in the record as a birthmark and a mole, and appellants' attack upon the proof thereof is based on contradictions or confusion as to the date of the incident; but the board, in the exercise of its long-established prerogative to determine credibility and conflicts of proof, was amply warranted in resolving the issue as it did, and, indeed, the testimony...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.