ZEMBA v. RODGERS


87 N.J. Super. 518 (1965)

210 A.2d 95

JOSEPH ZEMBA, PLAINTIFF, v. FRANK J. RODGERS, RICHARD H. NAGEL, SAMUEL MOORE & CO., A CORPORATION, AND THE NYCOIL COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided May 6, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frederick L. Bernstein for plaintiff (Mr. Walter H. Jones, attorney).

Mr. Donald A. Teare of the Ohio Bar for defendant Samuel Moore & Co. (Messrs. Carpenter, Bennett & Morrissey, attorneys).


MINTZ, J.S.C.

Defendant Samuel Moore & Co. (Moore) moves for dismissal of the complaint, asserting lack of jurisdiction over the person and the subject matter. R.R. 4:12-2(a), (b). At the conclusion of the oral argument the Court ruled that the proofs clearly indicated the existence of in personam jurisdiction over Moore. Decision was reserved as to the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter.

Moore contends that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases