1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 86 N.J.
  5. 86 N.J. Super. 508 (1965)
 

STATE v. SABO

86 N.J. Super. 508 (1965)

207 A.2d 340

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EUGENE SABO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 23, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Dean Sanford, assigned attorney, argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, attorneys; Mr. Frederic K. Becker, of counsel).

Mr. William D. Danberry, Assistant County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Edward J. Dolan, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney).

Before Judges CONFORD, KILKENNY and LEWIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KILKENNY, J.A.D.

The Middlesex County grand jury indicted defendant for "uttering" a forged check, well knowing that the endorsement of the payee thereon was a forgery, in violation of N.J.S. 2A:109-1. After a two-day trial, the foreman of the jury announced the verdict as follows:

"We find the Defendant guilty of Uttering and Passing the check."

The judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases