COOLIDGE v. KASKEL


16 N.Y.2d 559 (1965)

Nicholas J. Coolidge et al., Suing on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Stockholders of 180 Tenants Corporation, Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. Alfred Kaskel et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided May 20, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward L. Sadowsky for appellants.

Charles Feit for respondents.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS and SCILEPPI. Dissent: Judge BURKE. Taking no part: Judge BERGAN.


Order affirmed, with costs. Question certified answered in the affirmative.

Judge BURKE dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum: The misrepresentations alleged in the complaint and allegedly contained in the prospectus issued pursuant to section 352-e of the General Business Law upon which the cause of action depends were made to each purchaser of stock in identical terms. That distinguishes this case from Brenner v. Title Guar. ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases