1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 359 F.2d
  5. 359 F.2d 214 (1965)
 

HARRISON v. UNITED STATES

Nos. 17991-17993.

359 F.2d 214 (1965)

Eddie M. HARRISON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Orson G. WHITE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Joseph R. SAMPSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Reargued June 15, 1965.

Opinions Released December 7, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Alfred V. J. Prather, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. George J. Thomas, Washington, D. C. (both appointed by this court), was on the brief, for appellant in No. 17991. Messrs. Charles A. Miller, Washington, D. C., and Thomas B. Donovan, Washington, D. C., were also on the brief for appellant in No. 17991.

Mr. Thomas H. Wall, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Ronald N. Cobert, Washington, D. C. (both appointed by this court), was on the brief, for appellant in No. 17992.

Mr. Monroe Oppenheimer, Washington, D. C. (appointed by this court), with whom Mr. I. William Stempil, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant in No. 17993.

Mr. William H. Willcox, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty. at the time the brief was filed, and Frank Q. Nebeker and Frederick G. Smithson, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. B. Michael Rauh, Asst. U. S. Atty. at the time the record was filed, also entered an appearance for appellee in No. 17991.

Reargued en Banc June 15, 1965.

Opinions Released December 7, 1965, Coincident with Opinion on Rehearing en Banc.

After the opinions of the judges in the sitting division had been considered, the court sua sponte ordered rehearing en banc as to one issue, as hereinafter appears.

PER CURIAM:

These appeals from judgments of conviction in the District Court came on to be heard before a division of the court consisting of Senior Circuit...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases