Per Curiam.
Respondent, who was admitted to the Bar in the Second Department in March, 1931, was charged with having violated the terms of an escrow agreement by releasing the funds to his client without authority. Respondent admitted the failure to turn over the funds to their rightful owner when called upon to do so. The Referee, who heard the evidence, found that respondent intended no fraud or deceit, but was actuated by the thought that he was facilitating...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
