PEOPLE v. RUGGERIO


16 N.Y.2d 550 (1965)

The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Louis G. Ruggerio, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided May 20, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert W. Schneider, District Attorney (Henry D. Blumberg of counsel), for appellant.

Edward J. Rose and George G. Fiesinger for respondent.

Concur: Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN. Chief Judge DESMOND dissents and votes to affirm upon the ground that the County Court had power in this situation under section 764 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to dismiss the information.


Order, insofar as it dismisses the information, reversed and a new trial ordered in a memorandum. Where there is no record of the testimony and the proceedings had upon a trial without fault of the Justice, the judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial ordered. Under the circumstances of this case, the County Court lacked the power, as a matter of law, to dismiss the information. (People v. Saalfield, 14 N.Y.2d 915

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases