PETTIT v. RICH

No. 40696.

400 P.2d 156 (1965)

W. O. PETTIT, Plaintiff in Error, v. Arthur RICH, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

March 9, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B.S. Null, Hartshorne, for plaintiff in error.

Brown, Brown & Brown, by Donald R. Hackler, McAlester, for defendant in error.


DAVISON, Justice.

This is an appeal by W.O. Pettit (plaintiff below) from a judgment rendered on jury verdict against him in the sum of $487.50 in favor of Arthur H. Rich (defendant and cross-petitioner below) in the trial of a replevin action initiated by plaintiff.

The specifications of error presented by plaintiff are based only on errors of law.

Plaintiff instituted the replevin action pursuant to 12 O...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases