1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 345 F.2d
  5. 345 F.2d 209 (1965)
 

APPLICATION OF BEACH

Patent Appeal No. 7368.

345 F.2d 209 (1965)

Application of Frederick H. BEACH and Vincent DiRubbio.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 20, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Connolly & Hutz, Wilmington, Del. (Nathan Bakalar, Wilmington, Del., of counsel), for appellants.

Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D. C. (Jere W. Sears, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, SMITH and ALMOND, Judges.

MARTIN, Judge.

The issue raised by this appeal is whether the Board of Appeals erred in sustaining the examiner's action rejecting claim 26 of appellants' patent application serial No. 496,662, filed March 25, 1965, titled "Loading." Some claims have been allowed.

Claim 26 reads:

"26. A stepping mechanism for sequentially advancing a series of article holders to accurate locations at a plurality of successive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases