1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 249 F.Supp.
  5. 249 F.Supp. 301 (1965)
 

HOWELL TIRE COMPANY v. GORDY TIRE COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 8520.

249 F.Supp. 301 (1965)

HOWELL TIRE COMPANY, a co-partnership composed of Lucille Howell and Ray Carroll of Enid, Oklahoma, Plaintiff, v. GORDY TIRE COMPANY et al., Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. Georgia, Atlanta Division.

February 24, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patrick Henry, Atlanta, Ga., Albert B. Monaco, Philadelphia, Pa., and Frank Carter, Enid, Okl., for plaintiff.

Walter M. Rodgers, and Michael J. Egan, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for defendants.

HOOPER, District Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE.

The plaintiffs Lucille Howell and Raymond C. Carroll, holders of two patents hereinafter described, brought this action against Gordy Tire Company and several of its agents and employees and against Gordy Aircraft Tire Company, claiming infringement of these patents. Complaint was also made as to violations of a dealership contract by Gordy Tire Company, but this contention was abandoned. While the validity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases