BRADFORD v. EDEN


47 Misc.2d 482 (1965)

Phyllis Bradford et al., Appellants, v. Rosalind Eden et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

July 8, 1965


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milton S. Zeiberg for appellants. Leonard Eden for respondents.

Concur — TILZER, J. P., HECHT and HOFSTADTER, JJ.


Per Curiam.

Order reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied. A plaintiff does not lose his right to an order of attachment pursuant to CPLR 6201 where he has joined an action in which he is entitled to an attachment with one or more causes of action in which he might not be entitled to such relief. (M. & S. Mercury Air Conditioning Corp. v. Rodolitz, N. Y. L. J., Jan. 29, 1964, p. 17, col. 5 [WIDLITZ, J.], affd. 22 A.D.2d 763.)

Order...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases