Judgment affirmed.
In our opinion, under the decisional law now applicable in this State, the interrogation of an accused after his arrest but prior to his arraignment, without advising him of his right to remain silent and of his right to an attorney, does not render inadmissible the statement obtained from the accused (cf. People v. Stanley,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.