Order affirmed.
There is no proof that defendant was prevented from perfecting his appeal by reason of his poverty; nor is there any proof of defendant's indigence. On the contrary, it appears that he was able to pay his retained counsel a substantial fee. Even if defendant were indigent, however, he would be entitled at most to the assignment of counsel or to a transcript of the record (People v. Fish,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
