1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 27 Wis.2d
  5. 27 Wis.2d 490 (1965)
 

BIE v. INGERSOLL

27 Wis.2d 490 (1965)

BIE and wife, Respondents, v. INGERSOLL and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 1, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Arnold, Arnold & Thorson of Elkhorn, and oral argument by Robert W. Arnold.

For the respondents the cause was submitted on the brief of Richardson & Hammett and R. G. Richardson, Jr., all of Delavan.

HEFFERNAN, J.

The only question raised on this appeal is whether the trial court's findings, that the asphalt-plant's operation and the trucking in connection with it constituted a nuisance, is contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. Colson v. Salzman (1956), 272 Wis. 397, 401, 75 N.W.2d 421. The activity complained of must create more than an inconvenience...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases