1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 245 F.Supp.
  5. 245 F.Supp. 258 (1965)
 

HANOVER SHOE, INC. v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORPORATION

Civ. No. 5395.

245 F.Supp. 258 (1965)

The HANOVER SHOE, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court M. D. Pennsylvania.

Supplemental and Amended Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Opinion August 12, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nogi, O'Malley & Harris, Scranton, Pa., Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City, for plaintiff.

Warren, Hill, Henkelman & McMenamin, Scranton, Pa., Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Sunderland & Kiendl, New York City, for defendant.

SHERIDAN, Chief Judge.

I.

INTRODUCTION

This is a private antitrust action which arises under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, Act of July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 Stat. 209, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 2, and under Section 4 of the Clayton Act, Act of October 15, 1914, c. 323, 38 Stat. 731, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15, to recover treble damages for defendant's alleged monopolization of the shoe machinery industry, and, particularly, its alleged monopolistic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases