1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 28 Wis.2d
  5. 28 Wis.2d 22 (1965)
 

LA FAVOR v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

28 Wis.2d 22 (1965)

LA FAVOR, Appellant, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 25, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Goldberg, Previant & Uelmen of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Albert J. Goldberg.

For the respondent Industrial Commission the cause was argued by Gordon Samuelsen, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

For the respondents Jack Levings, Kenneth Levings, and Shelby Mutual Insurance Company there was a brief by Kivett & Kasdorf, attorneys, and Clifford C. Kasdorf of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Clifford C. Kasdorf.

GORDON, J.

The Industrial Commission determined that Mr. La Favor was functioning as an independent contractor at the time of his accident, and we believe that the record fully sustains such conclusion. The commission did not make an express finding that Mr. La Favor was not an employee at the time of the accident, but such determination is reasonably implicit in its order.

This appeal requires that we examine the nature of the services performed by the applicant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases