1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 352 F.2d
  5. 352 F.2d 150 (1965)
 

AMF TUBOSCOPE, INC. v. CUNNINGHAM

No. 7836.

352 F.2d 150 (1965)

AMF TUBOSCOPE, INC., and American Machine & Foundry Co., Appellants, v. Joe H. CUNNINGHAM and Arrow Pipe Service, Inc., Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

October 6, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tom Arnold and Frank S. Vaden III, Houston, Tex., (Arnold & Roylance, Houston, Tex., Robert M. Rainey and Rainey, Flynn & Welch, Oklahoma City, Okl., of counsel, on the brief), for appellants.

Jerry J. Dunlap, Oklahoma City, Okl., (W. Samuel Dykeman, Morgan, Dykeman & Williamson and Dunlap & Laney, Oklahoma City, Okl., of counsel, on the brief), for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

This is a patent infringement suit, originally brought by Tuboscope Company,1 a Delaware Corporation, against Joe H. Cunningham and Arrow Pipe Service, Inc.2 The plaintiff below alleged that the defendants had infringed each of three patents owned by Tuboscope, directly and contributorily, and had induced infringement of such patents by others, and that defendants intended to continue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases