Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements; motion granted; and third-party complaint dismissed, with costs.
The main complaint alleges, in substance, that the defendants negligently: (a) designed the guardrail, with the rail beam protruding beyond the rail post; (b) placed the guardrail too close to the roadway; and (c) maintained the guardrail and roadway in such manner as to constitute a danger and a hazard. In its third-party complaint, the Authority alleges...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.