1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 26 Wis.2d
  5. 26 Wis.2d 466 (1965)
 

BARTH v. STATE

26 Wis.2d 466 (1965)

BARTH, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 2, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by Gordon Myse of Appleton.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was George Thompson, attorney general.

GORDON, J.

The sole ground of this appeal is Mr. Barth's contention that he was convicted upon an extrajudicial confession which was not corroborated. The state concedes that under the law of Wisconsin a confession by itself is insufficient to support the conviction of the confessor. Holt v. State (1962), 17 Wis.2d 468, 480, 117 N.W.2d 626; State v. Bronston (1959), 7 Wis.2d 627

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases