UNITED STATES v. MULLINS

No. 9822.

344 F.2d 128 (1965)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. J. D. MULLINS, Jr., and Emily J. Mullins, Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Decided April 14, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Clyde Pearson, Roanoke Va. (Hopkins, Pearson & Engleby, Roanoke, Va., on brief), for appellants.

H. Garnett Scott, Asst. U. S. Atty., for appellee.

Before SOBELOFF, BOREMAN and BRYAN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

Summary judgment was entered in this case upon a state of facts assumed to be uncontroverted. It appears, however, that the pleadings and the record do not contain the documents which might possibly supply a basis for the assumption, nor was any testimony taken and there is no agreement between the parties upon the facts so assumed. In the circumstances we think the case should be remanded for a full inquiry. Summary judgment was inappropriate. Rule 56...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases