AFFIRMED.
PER CURIAM.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon and appeals.
1. The sole question raised on the appeal is whether ORS 163.250, the statute denouncing the crime of assault with a dangerous weapon, is unconstitutional, because ORS 163.320, which defines the crime of pointing a firearm at another, prescribes (as it is asserted) "a different and lesser punishment for the same act committed under the same...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.