1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 353 F.2d
  5. 353 F.2d 86 (1965)
 

SUN OIL COMPANY v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION

No. 15271.

353 F.2d 86 (1965)

SUN OIL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided November 8, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phillip D. Endom, John A. Ward, III, Philadelphia, Pa., Charles F. Heidrick, J. Colbert Peurifoy, Dallas, Tex., Robert E. May, Louis Flax, May, Shannon & Morley, Washington, D. C., for Sun Oil Co., Martin A. Row, Dallas, Tex., of counsel.

Peter H. Schiff, Richard A. Solomon, Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Sol., Robert L. Russell, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Herzel H. E. Plaine, Atty., F. P. C., Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before McLAUGHLIN, FORMAN and GANEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The Commission's Regulations under the Natural Gas Act, Section 154.91 et seq. relating to producers rates provide that independent producers subject to the Commission's jurisdiction file their contracts as rate schedules. Section 154.93 defines pricing provisions that are permissible, prohibits all other types of price changing clauses and specifies that contracts which are executed after April 2, 1962, and which contain impermissible price changing clauses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases