1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 352 F.2d
  5. 352 F.2d 87 (1965)
 

H. C. BAXTER & BRO. v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY

No. 6516.

352 F.2d 87 (1965)

H. C. BAXTER & BRO., et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. The GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, Inc., Defendant, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

Decided October 29, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Brown Morton, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom W. Brown Morton, Washington, D. C., Paul A. Wescott, Portland, Me., McLean, Morton & Boustead, Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Taylor & Adams, Washington, D. C., and Drummond & Wescott, Portland, Me., were on brief, for appellants.

Nicholas John Stathis, New York City, with whom William B. Mahoney, Portland, Me., John T. Kelton, Elmer R. Helferich and Watson, Leavenworth, Kelton & Taggart, New York City, were on brief, for appellee.

Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, HAMLIN, Senior Circuit Judge, and McENTEE, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a finding of invalidity of a process patent for pretreating French fried potatoes so they will fry to a substantially even color. The facts and an extensive discussion are found in the opinion of the district court, 236 F.Supp. 601. Without deciding whether the evidence justified a conclusion that the patent claims in suit are invalid because wholly inoperative, we think the evidence supports...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases