1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 407 P.2d
  5. 407 P.2d 28 (1965)
 

HOEPRICH v. CUMMISKEY

No. 20917.

407 P.2d 28 (1965)

Karl R. HOEPRICH and Nena M. Hoeprich, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Vincent R. CUMMISKEY, and J. E. Squire, Jack Squire, and Billie Squire, a co-partnership, doing business as Moon Realty Co., Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado, In Department.

November 1, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richeson & Lawler, Denver, for plaintiffs in error.

C. Hamilton Evans, Denver, Walter S. Erwin, Littleton, for defendants in error.

MOORE, Justice.

We shall refer to plaintiffs in error as the plaintiffs, and to defendants in error as the defendants or by name.

The action was brought to recover the sum of $2,000.00 which the plaintiffs had paid upon the execution of a contract entered into between them and the defendant Cummiskey, under the terms of which the plaintiffs agreed to purchase from the defendant a liquor business in Littleton, Colorado...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases