CLARK v. CITY OF TUCSON

Nos. 2 CA-CIV 49, 2 CA-CIV 50.

1 Ariz. App. 431 (1965)

403 P.2d 936

Sam R. CLARK, Cochise County Assessor and F.C. Alexander, Cochise County Treasurer, Appellants, v. CITY OF TUCSON, a municipal corporation, Appellee. F.C. ALEXANDER, Cochise County Treasurer, Appellant, v. CITY OF TUCSON, a municipal corporation, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

July 8, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Riley, Cochise County Atty., Lloyd C. Helm, former Cochise County Atty., Bisbee, for appellants.

Calvin Webster, City Atty., Dwight E. Eller, Asst. City Atty., Tucson, for appellee.


MOLLOY, Judge.

We have before us two appeals which present the identical legal question. Both involve the question of whether land owned by the plaintiff, City of Tucson, lying within the boundaries of Cochise County is exempt from ad valorem taxes imposed in Cochise County.

The plaintiff, City of Tucson, prevailed in both actions in the trial court. In the one it received a writ of mandamus ordering Sam R. Clark, Cochise County Assessor and F.C. Alexander...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases