1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 23 A.D.2d
  5. 23 A.D.2d 404 (1965)
 

MATTER OF BAUMAN v. FUSCO

23 A.D.2d 404 (1965)

In the Matter of Bert Bauman et al., Appellants, v. Louis Fusco et al., Respondents In the Matter of Irwin I. Brooks et al., Appellants, v. Charles A. Buckley et al., Respondents In the Matter of Gerald P. Goldsmith et al., Appellants, v. Louis Fusco et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

July 8, 1965.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney H. Rosen of counsel (Murray A. Gordon with him on the brief), for appellants.

Eugene L. Sugarman of counsel (Eugene L. Sugarman and S. Philip Cohen, attorneys), for respondents.

BREITEL, J. P., VALENTE, McNALLY and STEVENS, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion; STEUER, J., dissents in opinion.

Per Curiam.

Absent a dissenting opinion herein, we would affirm the order appealed from upon the opinion of SPECTOR, J., at Special Term. The dissenting opinion — as do the parties in these cases — acknowledges that the county committee at its organization meeting on June 18, 1964 had the power to adopt a new rule as to the boundaries of the 7th and 12th executive districts. But the appellants would...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases