CURTIS v. HANNAFORD & TALBOT

Docket No. 21997.

236 Cal.App.2d 182 (1965)

45 Cal. Rptr. 785

W.L. CURTIS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HANNAFORD & TALBOT, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

July 29, 1965.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice E. Gibson for Defendant and Appellant.

Rawles, Nelson & Golden and Joan G. Poulos for Plaintiff and Respondent.


DEVINE, J.

Respondent, Curtis, obtained judgment against Hannaford & Talbot, a corporation, stock brokers, on an asserted warranty that shares of a certain stock would produce 100 per cent profit over a period of 12 months; and the brokerage firm appeals.

Respondent had bought and sold securities through appellant and had dealt with appellant's salesman, Turner, at its Ukiah office. In the transaction which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases